
Classic watches · Casio
Casio MTP-1314SG-1AVDF (A777)- Movement:
- Quartz
- Case diameter:
- 46 mm
- Reference price:
- SAR 132
The two differ in 3 of the specs we have recorded, and the Casio MTP-1314SG-1AVDF (A777) is cheaper by SAR 89 (prices checked 10 Nov 2026).

Choose the
Meikon F2B66 if you care about:The deciding difference here: water resistance and price.
Compares recorded specs; a missing spec does not mean the feature is absent.

Classic watches · Casio
Casio MTP-1314SG-1AVDF (A777)
Case diameter
Strap material
Water resistance
Scroll the table sideways to see the rest.
| Spec | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Reference price | SAR 132 | SAR 221 |
| Movement | Quartz | — |
| Water resistance | ✓ 50 m | 30.5 m |
| Glass | Metal | — |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Case diameter | 46 mm | 38 mm |
| Case shape | — | Square |
| Strap material | Stainless steel | Leather |
| Weight | 100 g | — |
| Date window | Yes | — |
| Colour | — | Gold |
Facts come from each Amazon.sa listing. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Buying through our links costs you nothing extra.
Prices, availability, shipping and returns can change. Check the final details on Amazon.sa before you buy.
Casio MTP-1314SG-1AVDF (A777): 46 mm; Meikon F2B66: 38 mm. A higher value is not necessarily better for you.
Water resistance is higher on the Casio MTP-1314SG-1AVDF (A777): 50 m vs 30.5 m on the Meikon F2B66. If this spec is your priority, the difference favours it.
Casio MTP-1314SG-1AVDF (A777): Stainless steel; Meikon F2B66: Leather. This is a spec difference, not a verdict that one is better overall.
No difference here: case material is Stainless steel on both.