
Classic watches · Casio
Casio MTP-1314SG-1AVDF (A777)- Movement:
- Quartz
- Case diameter:
- 46 mm
- Reference price:
- SAR 132
The two differ in 3 of the specs we have recorded, and the U.S. Polo Assn. US8621 is cheaper by SAR 62 (prices checked 11 Nov 2026).
The deciding difference here: weight and price.
Compares recorded specs; a missing spec does not mean the feature is absent.

Classic watches · Casio
Casio MTP-1314SG-1AVDF (A777)
Classic watches · U.S. Polo Assn.
U.S. Polo Assn. US8621Case diameter
Glass
Weight
Scroll the table sideways to see the rest.
| Spec | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Reference price | SAR 132 | SAR 70 |
| Case material | Stainless steel | — |
| Water resistance | 50 m | — |
| Glass | Metal | Glass |
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Case diameter | 46 mm | 50 mm |
| Strap material | Stainless steel | — |
| Weight | ✓ 100 g | 136 g |
| Date window | Yes | — |
| Warranty | — | 1 years |
Facts come from each Amazon.sa listing. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Buying through our links costs you nothing extra.
Prices, availability, shipping and returns can change. Check the final details on Amazon.sa before you buy.
No difference here: movement is Quartz on both.
Casio MTP-1314SG-1AVDF (A777): 46 mm; U.S. Polo Assn. US8621: 50 mm. A higher value is not necessarily better for you.
Casio MTP-1314SG-1AVDF (A777): Metal; U.S. Polo Assn. US8621: Glass. This is a spec difference, not a verdict that one is better overall.
Weight is lower on the Casio MTP-1314SG-1AVDF (A777): 100 g vs 136 g on the U.S. Polo Assn. US8621. If this spec is your priority, the difference favours it.