Samsung SM-L320NZSQXAA vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
1 recorded spec differences. Samsung SM-L320NZSQXAA is currently the cheaper of the two on Amazon.sa (SAR 1,372 vs SAR 1,752, checked 5 Nov 2026).
Specifications side by side
| Spec | Samsung SM-L320NZSQXAA | Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Phone, battery and calls | ||
| Battery life | 1.7 days | — |
| Cellular (LTE/eSIM) | — | Yes |
| Phone compatibility | — | Android |
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Size, screen and durability | ||
| Case size | 40 mm | 47 mm |
| Display type | — | AMOLED |
| Display size | 1.3 in | — |
| Water resistance | — | 10 ATM |
| Case material | — | Titanium |
| Weight | 30 g | — |
| Health and payments | ||
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Contactless payment (NFC) | — | Yes |
| Heart-rate tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Other specs | ||
| App control (Wi-Fi) | — | Yes |
Highlighted rows differ. Facts come from each Amazon.sa listing. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Buying through our links costs you nothing extra.