
Smartwatches · Samsung
Samsung SM-L320NZSQXAA- Case size:
- 40 mm
- Display size:
- 1.3 in
- Reference price:
- SAR 1,372
The two differ in 3 of the specs we have recorded, and the Samsung SM-L320NZSQXAA is cheaper by SAR 167 (prices checked 5 Nov 2026).

Choose the
Amazfit A2549 if you care about:The deciding difference here: battery life and price.
Compares recorded specs; a missing spec does not mean the feature is absent.

Smartwatches · Samsung
Samsung SM-L320NZSQXAA
Case size
Display size
Battery life
Scroll the table sideways to see the rest.
| Spec | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Reference price | SAR 1,372 | SAR 1,539 |
| Battery life | 1.7 days | ✓ 17 days |
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Case size | 40 mm | 44 mm |
| Display type | — | AMOLED |
| Display size | 1.3 in | 1.32 in |
| Case material | — | Titanium |
| Weight | 30 g | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Heart-rate tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 4.5 x 4.5 x 1.3 cm |
Facts come from each Amazon.sa listing. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Buying through our links costs you nothing extra.
Prices, availability, shipping and returns can change. Check the final details on Amazon.sa before you buy.
Battery life is higher on the Amazfit A2549: 17 days vs 1.7 days on the Samsung SM-L320NZSQXAA. If this spec is your priority, the difference favours it.
No difference here: built-in GPS is Yes on both.
Samsung SM-L320NZSQXAA: 40 mm; Amazfit A2549: 44 mm. A higher value is not necessarily better for you.
Display size is higher on the Amazfit A2549: 1.32 in vs 1.3 in on the Samsung SM-L320NZSQXAA. If this spec is your priority, the difference favours it.