
Refrigerators · Saeoola
Saeoola HLBC90T- Total capacity:
- 91 L
- Fresh-food capacity:
- 91 L
- Reference price:
- SAR 2,774
The two differ in 8 of the specs we have recorded, and the Arrow RO-700SNS is cheaper by SAR 1,056 (prices checked 4 Nov 2026).

Choose the
Saeoola HLBC90T if you care about:
Choose the
Arrow RO-700SNS if you care about:The deciding difference here: total capacity and fresh-food capacity and price.
Compares recorded specs; a missing spec does not mean the feature is absent.

Refrigerators · Saeoola
Saeoola HLBC90T
Refrigerators · Arrow
Arrow RO-700SNSTotal capacity
Fresh-food capacity
Number of doors
Scroll the table sideways to see the rest.
| Spec | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Reference price | SAR 2,774 | SAR 1,717 |
| Total capacity | 91 L | ✓ 430 L |
| Configuration | Single door | — |
| Inverter compressor | — | Yes |
| Defrost system | Manual | — |
| Dimensions | 42.5×40×83.3 cm | 62×83.6×189 cm |
| Fresh-food capacity | 91 L | ✓ 249 L |
| Freezer capacity | — | 181 L |
| Number of doors | 1 | 2 |
| Number of shelves | 4 | ✓ 8 |
| Convertible freezer | No | No |
| Annual energy use | ✓ 328 kWh | 408 kWh |
| Warranty | — | 2 years |
| Product weight | ✓ 20.41 kg | 78 kg |
| Colour | Black | Silver |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
Facts come from each Amazon.sa listing. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Buying through our links costs you nothing extra.
Prices, availability, shipping and returns can change. Check the final details on Amazon.sa before you buy.
Total capacity is higher on the Arrow RO-700SNS: 430 L vs 91 L on the Saeoola HLBC90T. If this spec is your priority, the difference favours it.
Saeoola HLBC90T: 42.5×40×83.3 cm; Arrow RO-700SNS: 62×83.6×189 cm. This is a spec difference, not a verdict that one is better overall.
Fresh-food capacity is higher on the Arrow RO-700SNS: 249 L vs 91 L on the Saeoola HLBC90T. If this spec is your priority, the difference favours it.
Saeoola HLBC90T: 1; Arrow RO-700SNS: 2. A higher value is not necessarily better for you.