Garmin Forerunner 965 vs Samsung SM-L320NZSQXAA
4 recorded spec differences. Samsung SM-L320NZSQXAA is currently the cheaper of the two on Amazon.sa (SAR 1,931 vs SAR 1,372, checked 5 Nov 2026).
Specifications side by side
| Spec | Garmin Forerunner 965 | Samsung SM-L320NZSQXAA |
|---|---|---|
| Phone, battery and calls | ||
| Battery life | 23 days | 1.7 days |
| Cellular (LTE/eSIM) | No | — |
| Phone compatibility | Android | — |
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Size, screen and durability | ||
| Case size | 47.2 mm | 40 mm |
| Display type | AMOLED | — |
| Display size | 1.4 in | 1.3 in |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Case material | Titanium | — |
| Weight | 53 g | 30 g |
| Health and payments | ||
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | — |
| Heart-rate tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Other specs | ||
| Release year | 2023 | — |
| App control (Wi-Fi) | Yes | — |
Highlighted rows differ. Facts come from each Amazon.sa listing. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Buying through our links costs you nothing extra.