
Classic watches · Casio
Casio MTP-VD03G-1AUDF- Movement:
- Quartz
- Case diameter:
- 41 mm
- Reference price:
- SAR 129
The two differ in 3 of the specs we have recorded, and the Casio MTP-VD03G-1AUDF is cheaper by SAR 92 (prices checked 10 Nov 2026).

Choose the
Casio MTP-VD03G-1AUDF if you care about:
Choose the
Meikon F2B66 if you care about:The deciding difference here: price.
Compares recorded specs; a missing spec does not mean the feature is absent.

Classic watches · Casio
Casio MTP-VD03G-1AUDF
Case diameter
Strap material
Water resistance
Scroll the table sideways to see the rest.
| Spec | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Reference price | SAR 129 | SAR 221 |
| Movement | Quartz | — |
| Case material | — | Stainless steel |
| Water resistance | 30 m | 30.5 m |
| Glass | Mineral glass | — |
| Case diameter | 41 mm | 38 mm |
| Case shape | — | Square |
| Strap material | Stainless steel | Leather |
| Weight | 106 g | — |
| Date window | Yes | — |
| Colour | — | Gold |
Facts come from each Amazon.sa listing. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Buying through our links costs you nothing extra.
Prices, availability, shipping and returns can change. Check the final details on Amazon.sa before you buy.
Casio MTP-VD03G-1AUDF: 41 mm; Meikon F2B66: 38 mm. A higher value is not necessarily better for you.
Water resistance is higher on the Meikon F2B66: 30.5 m vs 30 m on the Casio MTP-VD03G-1AUDF. If this spec is your priority, the difference favours it.
Casio MTP-VD03G-1AUDF: Stainless steel; Meikon F2B66: Leather. This is a spec difference, not a verdict that one is better overall.