
Classic watches · Casio
Casio MRW-200H-3BVDF- Movement:
- Quartz
- Case diameter:
- 44.6 mm
- Reference price:
- SAR 139
The two differ in 4 of the specs we have recorded, and the Casio MRW-200H-3BVDF is cheaper by SAR 5 (prices checked 3 Nov 2026).

Choose the
Casio MRW-200H-3BVDF if you care about:
Choose the
Cheetah CH1501 if you care about:The deciding difference here: water resistance and price.
Compares recorded specs; a missing spec does not mean the feature is absent.

Classic watches · Casio
Casio MRW-200H-3BVDF
Classic watches · Cheetah
Cheetah CH1501Case diameter
Case material
Water resistance
Scroll the table sideways to see the rest.
| Spec | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Reference price | SAR 139 | SAR 144 |
| Movement | Quartz | — |
| Case material | Resin | Stainless steel |
| Water resistance | ✓ 100 m | 30 m |
| Glass | Resin | Mineral glass |
| Case diameter | 44.6 mm | 20.4 mm |
| Case shape | — | Rectangular |
| Strap material | Resin | — |
| Weight | 39 g | — |
| Date window | Yes | — |
| Colour | Black | — |
Facts come from each Amazon.sa listing. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Buying through our links costs you nothing extra.
Prices, availability, shipping and returns can change. Check the final details on Amazon.sa before you buy.
Casio MRW-200H-3BVDF: 44.6 mm; Cheetah CH1501: 20.4 mm. A higher value is not necessarily better for you.
Water resistance is higher on the Casio MRW-200H-3BVDF: 100 m vs 30 m on the Cheetah CH1501. If this spec is your priority, the difference favours it.
Casio MRW-200H-3BVDF: Resin; Cheetah CH1501: Stainless steel. This is a spec difference, not a verdict that one is better overall.
Casio MRW-200H-3BVDF: Resin; Cheetah CH1501: Mineral glass. This is a spec difference, not a verdict that one is better overall.