
Classic watches · Casio
Casio LTP-1129G-7ARDF- Movement:
- Quartz
- Case diameter:
- 26 mm
- Reference price:
- SAR 157
The two differ in 4 of the specs we have recorded, and the Casio MTP-VT01GL-3BUDF (A1782) is cheaper by SAR 9 (prices checked 3 Nov 2026).

Choose the
Casio LTP-1129G-7ARDF if you care about:The deciding difference here: price.
Compares recorded specs; a missing spec does not mean the feature is absent.

Classic watches · Casio
Casio LTP-1129G-7ARDF
Classic watches · Casio
Casio MTP-VT01GL-3BUDF (A1782)Case diameter
Strap material
Glass
Scroll the table sideways to see the rest.
| Spec | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Reference price | SAR 157 | SAR 148 |
| Case material | Stainless steel | — |
| Glass | Mineral glass | Metal |
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Water resistance | 30 m | 30 m |
| Case diameter | 26 mm | 40 mm |
| Strap material | Stainless steel | Leather |
| Weight | ✓ 38 g | 41 g |
| Colour | — | Green |
| Warranty | 1 years | — |
Facts come from each Amazon.sa listing. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Buying through our links costs you nothing extra.
Prices, availability, shipping and returns can change. Check the final details on Amazon.sa before you buy.

Timex T21912PF vs Casio LTP-1129G-7ARDF
Casio LTP-V007L-9EUDF vs Casio LTP-1129G-7ARDF
Casio MTP-VT01GL-3BUDF (A1782) vs Casio MTP-VD03D-2A2
Casio MTP-VT01GL-3BUDF (A1782) vs Casio MTP-VD03G-1AUDF
Casio MTP-VT01GL-3BUDF (A1782) vs Casio MTP-V004L-1AUDF
Casio MTP-V004D-7BUDF vs Casio MTP-VT01GL-3BUDF (A1782)No difference here: movement is Quartz on both.
Casio LTP-1129G-7ARDF: 26 mm; Casio MTP-VT01GL-3BUDF (A1782): 40 mm. A higher value is not necessarily better for you.
No difference here: water resistance is 30 m on both.
Casio LTP-1129G-7ARDF: Stainless steel; Casio MTP-VT01GL-3BUDF (A1782): Leather. This is a spec difference, not a verdict that one is better overall.