Casio LQ-139L-4B1DF vs ACCUTIME USC80466: which one suits you?

The two differ in 2 of the specs we have recorded, and the ACCUTIME USC80466 is cheaper by SAR 11 (prices checked 3 Nov 2026).

Which one should you choose?

  • No clear lead in the recorded specs; design or brand preference may decide.
  • Paying less: cheaper by SAR 11
  • Higher water resistance: 100 m vs 30 m

The deciding difference here: water resistance and price.

Compares recorded specs; a missing spec does not mean the feature is absent.

Key differences

  • Case diameter

    27 mm44.4 mm
  • Water resistance

    30 m✓ 100 m

Specifications side by side

7 of 7 specs

Scroll the table sideways to see the rest.

Spec
CasioSAR 98
Casio LQ-139L-4B1DF specs
ACCUTIMESAR 87
ACCUTIME USC80466 specs
Reference priceSAR 98SAR 87
Case material—Stainless steel
Water resistance30 m✓ 100 m
Glass—Glass
MovementQuartzQuartz

Facts come from each Amazon.sa listing. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Buying through our links costs you nothing extra.

Before you buy

Prices, availability, shipping and returns can change. Check the final details on Amazon.sa before you buy.

Similar comparisons

Direct comparison questions

What is the difference in movement between the Casio LQ-139L-4B1DF and the ACCUTIME USC80466?

No difference here: movement is Quartz on both.

What is the difference in case diameter between the Casio LQ-139L-4B1DF and the ACCUTIME USC80466?

Casio LQ-139L-4B1DF: 27 mm; ACCUTIME USC80466: 44.4 mm. A higher value is not necessarily better for you.

What is the difference in water resistance between the Casio LQ-139L-4B1DF and the ACCUTIME USC80466?

Water resistance is higher on the ACCUTIME USC80466: 100 m vs 30 m on the Casio LQ-139L-4B1DF. If this spec is your priority, the difference favours it.