
Classic watches · Casio
Casio AQ-230GG-2ADF- Movement:
- Quartz
- Case diameter:
- 38 mm
- Reference price:
- SAR 175
The two differ in 4 of the specs we have recorded, and the Casio AQ-230GG-2ADF is cheaper by SAR 46 (prices checked 10 Nov 2026).

Choose the
Casio AQ-230GG-2ADF if you care about:
Choose the
Meikon F2B66 if you care about:The deciding difference here: water resistance and price.
Compares recorded specs; a missing spec does not mean the feature is absent.

Classic watches · Casio
Casio AQ-230GG-2ADF
Case material
Strap material
Water resistance
Scroll the table sideways to see the rest.
| Spec | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Reference price | SAR 175 | SAR 221 |
| Movement | Quartz | — |
| Case material | Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Water resistance | ✓ 100 m | 30.5 m |
| Case shape | — | Square |
| Strap material | Silicone | Leather |
| Weight | 47 g | — |
| Case diameter | 38 mm | 38 mm |
| Colour | Grey | Gold |
| Warranty | 2 years | — |
Facts come from each Amazon.sa listing. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Buying through our links costs you nothing extra.
Prices, availability, shipping and returns can change. Check the final details on Amazon.sa before you buy.
No difference here: case diameter is 38 mm on both.
Water resistance is higher on the Casio AQ-230GG-2ADF: 100 m vs 30.5 m on the Meikon F2B66. If this spec is your priority, the difference favours it.
Casio AQ-230GG-2ADF: Silicone; Meikon F2B66: Leather. This is a spec difference, not a verdict that one is better overall.
Casio AQ-230GG-2ADF: Plastic; Meikon F2B66: Stainless steel. This is a spec difference, not a verdict that one is better overall.