Benyar BY-5140 vs Casio AQ-230GG-2ADF: which one suits you?

The two differ in 5 of the specs we have recorded, and the Benyar BY-5140 is cheaper by SAR 55 (prices checked 10 Nov 2026).

Which one should you choose?

  • Paying less: cheaper by SAR 55
  • Higher water resistance: 100 m vs 30 m
  • Lower weight: 47 g vs 80 g

The deciding difference here: water resistance and weight and price.

Compares recorded specs; a missing spec does not mean the feature is absent.

Key differences

  • Case diameter

    45 mm38 mm
  • Case material

    Stainless steelPlastic
  • Strap material

    LeatherSilicone

Specifications side by side

14 of 14 specs

Scroll the table sideways to see the rest.

Spec
BenyarSAR 120
Benyar BY-5140 specs
CasioSAR 175
Casio AQ-230GG-2ADF specs
Reference priceSAR 120SAR 175
Display typeAnalog—
Case materialStainless steelPlastic
Water resistance30 m✓ 100 m
GlassHardlex—
MovementQuartzQuartz

Facts come from each Amazon.sa listing. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Buying through our links costs you nothing extra.

Before you buy

Prices, availability, shipping and returns can change. Check the final details on Amazon.sa before you buy.

Similar comparisons

Direct comparison questions

What is the difference in movement between the Benyar BY-5140 and the Casio AQ-230GG-2ADF?

No difference here: movement is Quartz on both.

What is the difference in case diameter between the Benyar BY-5140 and the Casio AQ-230GG-2ADF?

Benyar BY-5140: 45 mm; Casio AQ-230GG-2ADF: 38 mm. A higher value is not necessarily better for you.

What is the difference in water resistance between the Benyar BY-5140 and the Casio AQ-230GG-2ADF?

Water resistance is higher on the Casio AQ-230GG-2ADF: 100 m vs 30 m on the Benyar BY-5140. If this spec is your priority, the difference favours it.

What is the difference in strap material between the Benyar BY-5140 and the Casio AQ-230GG-2ADF?

Benyar BY-5140: Leather; Casio AQ-230GG-2ADF: Silicone. This is a spec difference, not a verdict that one is better overall.